Godse's children are scared of Gandhi's children

Pragya Thakur had to apologize under the pressure of the good party, but his point is that hundred percent is right that Godse was a patriot under a particular ideology - he used to worship from the country's definition in his eyes. There was no personal animosity with Gandhiji. He fully executed what the RSS or Hindu Mahasabha taught him. The crisis is that those who are RSS or related organizations today, they do not believe in their ideology, so they do not shoot Gandhi from the front like Godse, they slaughter them behind and behind.They do not take the idea, take the dress of ideas - when Gandhi came to the school, then dressed Gandhi's dress, reached Ambedkar's school and then embraced Ambedkar's cloak. But Godse was not a man with lobbies. He bought a pistol directly, remembered his gurus and shot Gandhi.

If Gandhiji had survived the Godse's pill, then he believed that Godse was a patriot. Just try to convince him that what he considers the country is not a country which he considers religion, it is not religion. Pragya Thakur does not understand himself so much that despite being a Sadhvi, he can not defend such a thing about Godse. He can not even see that the BJP who apologized to him, himself wants to kill Rose Gandhi in some way.

Today, a regional BJP spokesperson said that Gandhi is the patriot of Pakistan. BJP has thrown them out. Interestingly, this thinking has been present within the Sangh Parivar for a long time. But perhaps a rule in the disciplined union family that it does not accept publicly what you think. It was only Godse's complaint that Gandhi took the side of Pakistan.

Many anti-Gandhi questions are asked to ask why we call Gandhi as the Father of the Nation. India has been a country since the birth of Gandhi centuries ago. No Bapu gave birth to him. In the first sight, this argument seems right. But who gave Gandhi the status of the Father of the Nation? Did Gandhi ask for this status for himself? In fact, Subhash Chandra Bose, considered to be Gandhi's opponent, called Gandhi as the Father of the Nation for the first time - it was a matter of 1944. Then why did Subhash Chandra Bose, sitting in Germany, think that Mahatma Gandhi (the status of Mahatma given to him by Rabindranath Tagore) should be called the Father of the Nation.

Because Subhash Chandra Bose was able to see that leaving behind the old rage-hatred, old chauhidies, old princely states and old princely states, shifting many of the traditions of the tradition-a new India emerging from the koch of freedom struggle. In fact, Mahatma Gandhi was shaping it. And he was not alone doing this work - in which he was taking the consensus of the whole nation together. When this consensus led them against him, he stood alone on the shore and the country celebrated independence in Delhi, he continued to stop the riots in Bengal. And in the frenzy that the country left them alone, the same mania killed them.

Indeed, Gandhi's assassination was also a poignant moment to remind that the newly created country had lost its father. If you do not burn a towel in the houses of 30th January 1948, count those who do not dry the tears, then you will find that such a mourning is possible only on the death of the father. Dad is not the one who makes us the medium of giving birth, they are also those who we consider to be fathers.

But those who completely confine relationships and countries to the root interpretation and the idol, they do not understand how a person can become a father of a nation. They do not understand that as many as the people are in geography, they become even in our consciousness. This is also true of individuals. Individuals' identities too often become so big in our consciousness that they become a symbol of a great value, sometimes the entire nation.

The National Self-Service Association understands that India and Gandhi have become united. Talking of love to India, Gandhi can not talk about hate. Therefore, his party forces BJP Pragya Thakur to apologize. But the truth is that he does not even love this India. The cultural heritage of this country has troubled him, in one round, three colors of his flags were used to quell him. It is the democratic compulsion of this country that it suspends its original ideas and does not hesitate to take the name of the name from Gandhi to Ambedkar.

Gandhi is also a father who is not necessarily worshiped. The good father is not to be worshiped, but to argue. Subhash Chandra Bose, who calls Gandhi a father, disagreed with him a long way. The Tagore non-cooperation movement Gandhi, who called Gandhi a Mahatma, was skeptical and Gandhi had to say that the poet lives in a different world of his imagination. Jawaharlal Nehru, who considered Gandhi as a guru, expressed his deep disagreement with his 'Hind Swaraj'.

In the later period, as the Congress got away from Gandhi, she started worshiping her by making her idol, as if her sins would be erased. Then the question of Gandhi questioning, the process of questioning Gandhi ended. The Sangh Parivar was afraid of Gandhi, then he also knew that by worshiping Gandhi, her sins will be hidden. The crisis is that people, who have been trained by his ideology, suddenly appear to make Godse sculptures, sometimes they appear as patriots and sometimes mumble on Gandhi.

But on such movements, the BJP leaders who defend themselves in the scary guise shows how much Gandhi scares them. The truth is that this country belongs to the children of Gandhi, their sons and daughters - they can not change Godse's blessings.